The Disruption of Protest

I was profoundly irritated, the intensity of which surprised me.  I was watching the semi-final US Open match between Coco Gauff and Karolina Muchova.   I was relaxed and enjoying their skill and passion, and silently hoping that some of the former might rub off on me, an avid recreational player.  In the second set, when Coco Gauff began to pull ahead (and whom I was rooting for), the match inexplicably stopped.  The TV commentators were confused by the turn of events.   After a couple of minutes it was reported that some protesters , who were making disruptive chants in the upper deck,  needed to be removed.  Good, I thought.  This is not the place for protest; it is an arena for tennis.  A few moments later the TV audience was told that the protesters were calling attention to the crisis of climate change. 

My irritation deepened.  As someone who has organized and participated in various social movements  and protests over the years, I said out loud — “what a screwed up strategy.  All they are doing is drawing attention to themselves.  Instead of recruiting allies to the crisis of climate change, they are only stoking resistance, if not hostility, to the activist cause.”  A memory immediately emerged: decades ago, hearing the Rev. William Sloane Coffin , who was a leading architect of protest over the Vietnam War and nuclear proliferation, remarking that in his experience seventy percent of protesters “don’t want to win; they just want to vent their spleen.”  We don’t need spleen venting at the US Open, I thought.  Let them play tennis.

They didn’t.  Because they couldn’t.  Most of the protesters had been easily removed by the security team.  But there was one who remained, literally glued his bare feet  to the  floor.  When this was reported, I yelled directly at the egomaniacal protester (at least from my perspective) through the TV screen:    “How self centered can you be?”   Other measures needed to be taken to unglue the offender from his perch, a process that took nearly fifty minutes.

Play resumed.  Coco Gauff and Karolina Muchova seemed to take the suspended match in stride.  After the match, which Ms. Gauff won, she said she had anticipated some sort of protest given that something similar had happened at Wimbledon a couple of months before.  She was resigned to the goings on.  She treated it like a rain delay.

Not me.

My irritation softened a bit the next day when I learned that the group which staged the protest were drawing a parallel to the disruption of a prime time tennis match with the disruption of climate change.  OK, I reluctantly conceded, climate change is disruptive.  But not at the US Open. 

Climate change is indeed disruptive.  We have been experiencing hotter summers, more violent weather storms, larger wildfires — in greater frequency and  without much warning.  Evacuations happen, property is destroyed, lives are lost.

Instead of paying attention to the disruptions — and to learn from them, more often than not our first instinct is to insulate ourselves from them.  That certainly was my initial reaction to the disruption at the US Open Women’s Semi-final.  We want life to go on, unencumbered, uninterrupted — following the script.  Let them play tennis.

One of the big illusions many of us carry is the idea that we can, in fact, script our life.  That we can follow a trajectory that we have crafted— and we do as much as we can to protect it.  It turns out that our zeal in providing that protection — by building more, fueling more, and mining more — has been a prime contributor to climate change.

Protests need to do more than disrupt.  The disruption generates anger and resentment that many, if not most, people can’t get beyond.  And they double down in response.  That certainly happened with me — and Lord knows how many others who were upset by the disruption of the US Open.  The ancient prophets — Jeremiah, Amos, Isaiah and Micah; and the modern day prophets — Mahatma Gandhi, Martin Luther King, engaged in protests,  but they were always embedded in a vision — of justice and hope.  Disruption wasn’t the goal. Transformation was.  Their words and actions called people to turn — from looking toward insulation and protection, to an outlook where liberty and love can be equally shared.

Different Definitions for Christian Orthodoxy and American Freedom

It was one church.  Sort of.  For seven hundred years, from the early 300s until 1054, there was essentially one Christian church — with two centers.  The Western center was in Rome and the Eastern center was in Constantinople, named after Constantine, the first...

The Hope of Ubuntu During an Avalanche of Change

“Out beyond ideas of rightdoing and wrongdoing there is a field.  I will meet you there.”  So wrote Sufi poet Rumi, a Persian who lived from 1207-1273.  His well-remembered words have framed the desire that many have had since to move beyond the limitations of...

Soweto and a Sermon

Two days ago I was in Soweto, a township of two million people located just outside of Johannesburg. For decades Soweto was seen as the epicenter of anguish during the years of Apartheid, from 1948 to 1994. Thousands of people were forcefully removed from rural...

An Interfaith Pre-Inauguration Gathering

Last night Braver Faith, a “department” of Braver Angels,  convened a pre-inauguration event.  We had three speakers – a Rabbi, a Southern Baptist Pastor, and the national Braver Angels Ambassador.  Surrounding their reflections were prayers offered by Christian,...

Inaugurations Past and Present

It wasn’t the first speech I heard, but was the first one I paid attention to.  I was 9 ½, home for lunch on January 20, 1961,  and watching television as President John F. Kennedy took the oath of office and then give his inaugural address.  My parents weren’t...

Ep 20 – “The Way of Love” with Bishop Michael Curry

In this episode I welcome the dynamic and inspirational Bishop Michael Curry, 27th Presiding Bishop and Primate of The Episcopal Church. Known worldwide for his passionate proclamation of “The Way of Love,” Bishop Curry’s ministry centers on the transformative power of God’s unconditional love to heal, unite, and renew. He rose to international prominence after delivering a moving sermon on the power of love at the wedding of Prince Harry and Meghan Markle. Yet his legacy extends far beyond that moment, as he has consistently challenged the Church to follow Jesus by embracing love, confronting societal divisions, fighting injustice, and embodying hope in action. This conversation will inspire and uplift anyone searching for deeper meaning, courage, and connection.

Seeing Woke and Born-Again in a New Way: Reflections on Epiphany

I didn’t know the story.  Most of us didn’t know the true story of 855 black women who served as the 6888th Central Postal Directory Battalion during World War II, dramatized in the recently released  film entitled “The Six Triple Eight”.  The well-trained battalion...

Three Lives Well Lived

We lost Jimmy Carter yesterday, the most recent death of a long list of prominent Americans who died this past year.  The well-deserved tributes are flooding in from all the media platforms, and the gratitude being expressed his extraordinary service to humanity,...

Christmas: An Invitation to Mystery and to the Soul

Christmas is a mystery.  The holiday evolves from a story which, over the centuries, has often been overshadowed by endless commercial appeals for presents, food, activities, along with some visual and cultural benchmarks for what constitutes home and hearth.  More...

Ep 19 – “The After Party: Toward Better Christian Politics” with Curtis Chang

In this episode, we delve into the importance of addressing spiritual dysfunctions in the Church and fostering meaningful dialogues across differences. Curtis offers helpful insights into overcoming political polarization, the temptations of power, and finding hope and mission in local communities.

Subscribe To Our Newsletter

Subscribe To Our Newsletter

Join my mailing list to receive the latest blog updates.

You have Successfully Subscribed!