Challenges to Trusting the Process

Trust the process.

This was a phrase I often heard when a strategy session or a problem-solving meeting bogged down.   The group would get stuck, and in frustration someone would either suggest we scrap the whole enterprise, or would start accusing a participant of being clueless or obstinate or worse.  Tension would rise, fatigue would kick in, body language was poised for fight or flight.  In the midst of it all the appointed leader would again say, “trust the process.”

Sometimes the group did in fact trust the process, and participants reengaged the issue, worked through the confusion – and came out with either greater clarity, or a clearer goal, or a deeper commitment to the mission (whatever it may have been.)  It was hard, and sometimes mind numbing work, but most people found that the process was worth it. In retrospect, what we discovered in the challenging process was that we shared a common humanity, and a desire for all of us to flourish.

And sometimes a group couldn’t, or wouldn’t, trust the process – and chasms of misunderstandings emerged, and resentment was the primary takeaway.  Which is where we are as a country these days – particularly when it comes to the rule of law.  A sizeable portion of the American electorate have expressed outrage over the May 30 conviction of former President Donald Trump.  Their fingers have been pointed – and cries of foul have been hurled, at a judge who is regarded to have been unfair, a jury that was biased (if not rigged), and at a prosecutor’s office that was carrying out a political vendetta.  The responses have ranged from shrill to threatening.   Since there has been no legitimate process, from their point of view, there is no reason to trust the verdict.

Moving up the judicial hierarchy, there is growing resentment – and a deepening mistrust, from a sizeable portion of the American electorate who feel that several Supreme Court justices have seriously compromised their independence – and their judicial integrity, by accepting lavish gifts from wealthy donors or displaying flags at their homes that reflect a definite political, if not legal bias.   Fingers have been pointed, and cries of foul have been hurled, over what are perceived as egregious conflicts of interest.    Although I have not heard of threatening responses to these recent disclosures, reactions certainly have been shrill.  It is thought that the process of judicial review, first established by Chief Justice John Marshall in 1803, which has been one of the bedrocks of Constitutional law, has been seriously compromised, leaving more and more people unable to trust the work of the Supreme Court.

Justice, and those who adjudicate justice, seem to be up for grabs.

Trust in our institutions – and trust in the people who lead these institutions, seem to be evaporating before our eyes.  Legal processes, business processes, political processes, educational processes, religious processes, are not just under scrutiny; more often than not they are under vengeful attack.  Pointing fingers and ascribing blame no longer seems to be a spectator sport; more and more of us are involved in this stomach-wrenching fray.

In 1858, in a speech accepting his nomination as the Republican candidate for the United States Senate (an election he lost to Stephen Douglas), Abraham Lincoln said, “ a house divided against itself cannot stand.”  As he often did, he borrowed from scripture, and the sayings of Jesus (Mark 3:25).  Lincoln spent his political career – and literally gave his life, trying to hold the American house together.  While he was well versed – and quite expert, in the political processes of his day, he appealed to a more abiding principle – of our common humanity, as expressed in both the Declaration of Independence and the US Constitution.  He exhorted and cajoled – and used his brilliance and eloquence, to get people to look beyond their hardened perspectives and deep-seated biases; and to find a way to claim and shape our common humanity. 

Some may argue that Lincoln’s words and witness didn’t work.  Many say the same thing about the words and witness of Jesus.  Maybe not in the short term:  Lincoln ended up presiding over a Civil War, and Jesus ended up crucified on a cross.  But in the long term, America held together – in large measure because of Lincoln’s witness;  and the admonition to love your neighbor still abides – even in the face of overwhelming odds — in large measure because of Jesus’ exhortation.  But Lincoln – and Jesus, in profound and similar ways, challenged people to trust the process – of claiming our shared humanity.

 

 

 

 

The Ten Commandments: Laws or Guidelines

Last week the governor of Louisiana signed a law mandating that the Ten Commandments be displayed in public school classrooms.  In some ways I get it, in spite of the fact that like so many it challenges the constitutional separation of church and state.  The Ten...

Mistrust and Trust

It was the spring of 1970.  The United States had just announced that it was expanding the war in Vietnam by authorizing bombing campaigns in Cambodia.  Campuses across the country erupted in protest.  On May 4, four protesting students at Kent State were shot and...

Ep 13 – “A Common Humanity” with Wilk Wilkinson

Wilk Wilkinson joins me to discuss his journey from political apathy to toxic political engagement, followed by the epiphany that since led him on a mission of bettering the world, one attitude at a time, by charting a course toward understanding, bridging divides, and fostering a community where wisdom prevails over discord.

Time and Space Needed for Grief and Mourning

“In war, death interrupts nothing.  Time doesn’t stop; it seems to accelerate.”  So wrote David French, in a New York Times column on May 25, 2024.  A veteran of the Iraq War, French goes on to say that in battle there is no time or space for mourning the loss of a...

Whose Land is It?

A couple of weeks ago, I came across this passage from my daily reading:     “From the wilderness and the Lebanon as far as the great river, the river Euphrates,all the land of the Hittites, to the Great Sea in the west shall be your territory.   No one will be able...

Ep 12 – “The Church Cracked Open” with The Rev. Canon Stephanie Spellers

Canon Spellers shares her journey from being a skeptic and critic of the Church to becoming a senior leader with a deep faith and a commitment to social justice. We explore the themes of mission, evangelism, the power of genuine curiosity in bridging divides, and ongoing efforts to address systemic issues like white supremacy within the church.

Dealing With Fear

Tornados of fear are swirling around the world, many of them invading our psyches.  Wars in Ukraine and Gaza, not to mention Sudan and Myanmar; escalating climate change; unrelenting gun violence; immigration crises.  To my mind, the storms of fear are particularly...

The Different Layers of Campus Anger

I lived a block away from a campus protest that erupted in November, 1974.  I was a teaching fellow at Doshisha University in Kyoto, Japan, and the campus was about to be shut down in opposition to Gerald Ford’s visit to the city, the first time an American President...

Campus Protests: What We Bring to What We See

In the past week I have had several conversations with friends about our respective opinions on what is happening on college campuses across the country, as students have set up encampments to protest the war in Gaza and insist that their university divest any...

Passover and the Importance of Remembering and Honoring Pain

I write this post on the first day of Passover, an annual commemoration of the Exodus story, when the Israelites escaped their slavery in Egypt, traveled through the parted waters of the Red Sea, spent forty years in the Sinai wilderness, and crossed the Jordan River...
Subscribe To Our Newsletter

Subscribe To Our Newsletter

Join my mailing list to receive the latest blog updates.

You have Successfully Subscribed!