Un-American: an American Slur

“Take that necklace off.  It’s un-American”, was the greeting a woman gave me while working as a door-to-door salesman in Indianapolis after my sophomore year in college.  I knocked on thousands of doors that summer. I was always unannounced, and unexpected.  Many welcomed me.  Some shunned me.  A few had their aggressive dogs express their resentment for them.  I was bitten twice.  It was hard work. But I learned a lot, especially about the diversity of opinion of what it means to be an American, and the wide range of hospitality we bring to one another.

For this one particular woman, I did not fit the image of an American, and therefore didn’t warrant her hospitality.  To her, I must have looked like a hippie:  I had hair over my ears, I wore no socks with my sneakers, and I wore a small, beaded necklace that had been made for me.  She seemed to equate me with the anti-war movement that was in full throttle that summer of 1971, and which for her was un-American.  She sent me on my way.

As we approach the Presidential election, the choice we have, at least on the surface, is between two nominees.  But the swirl of messages, opinions and threats that bombard us daily suggest that the candidacies of former President Trump and Vice President Harris present us with a more profound choice:  what is American and what is un-American.  The boundaries between them can sometimes be rather stark, and can seem to be as arbitrary as to whether or not one wears a beaded necklace around their neck.

For many on the political right, tight boundaries are drawn around the salient issues of abortion, immigration and voting rights.  Increasingly, those whose opinions fall outside those boundaries are regarded by some angry pundits to be un-American.  There are some on the right who say that Kamala Harris is un-American, but most of the harsh critique is focused on her previous and current policies and proposals, which are deemed to be un-American.  For many on the political left, Donald Trump is seen – as a person, to be un-American, given that he is a convicted felon and has been found liable for sexual assault.

When the boundaries are challenged, as they inevitably are during election cycles, the defenders of the boundaries tend to double down and make them even tighter.  And inconsistencies are ignored.  Much energy on the political right is spent sharpening and maintaining the boundaries around the aforementioned issues of abortion, immigration and voting, but when regulations are proposed around free speech or gun ownership, the response is immediate and hostile:  that the government, or its surrogate, is denying people their civil liberties and interfering with their freedom. 

On the political left, which tends to live with more fluid boundaries, there is the temptation to think that Trump voters are as un-American as they regard Trump himself.  That Trump – and his supporters, be they fierce or tenuous, should be painted with the same brush.

Many, if not most, of these assessments are unfair, and ultimately destructive to America.  Donald Trump is not un-American.  Throughout US history leaders have emerged who have broken the rules, demeaned others, and aspired to be autocratic.  Donald Trump may be unfit for the Presidential office, as many are contending.  Many on the other side of the political spectrum maintain that Kamala Harris is unfit for the Presidential office, for very different reasons.   

Fitness for office is different from being un-American.  I think the slur “un-American” is a reaction to the paradigm shifts we have experienced as a country.  In the past century American has given women the right to vote, allowed same sex marriage, ended Jim Crow laws, expanded civil rights to further prohibit discrimination on the basis of race, age, ability or gender, enabled people to explore their gender, and on and on.  These shifts have not always come easily.  Hospitality – which is the demonstrated commitment to extend a welcome to those who have arrived at a “foreign land” of thought – by assuring communication, a willingness to listen, and a respect of choices, has not always been offered.  At the extreme edges of the political spectrum, there are forces and voices which insist that people who don’t fit the model of what it means to be American should be sent on their way.

Being an American is hard work.  America is an ongoing experiment that has built a country and reshaped the world.  We deal with difference – and diversity.  Our boundaries – be they literal or figurative, continue to shift.  Hospitality has been, and continues to be, essential.

 

The Many Facets of Exile

I didn’t intend for it to be a self-imposed exile, but in some ways that is how it turned out.  When I graduated from college in 1973 I lived in Kyoto, Japan for two years on a fellowship that involved teaching and being the resident Fellow in a university dormitory....

Out of Many, One

On Sunday evening, July 6, the Braver Faith team of Braver Angels hosted a webinar entitled "Faith and Freedom Through Reflection and Prayer." The event was scheduled to honor the Fourth of July weekend. A link to the 75 minute webinar can be found  here.a link  It...

Faith and Freedom: Preparing for July 4

Many years ago I took my family to the July 4th festivities at Old Sturbridge Village,  an historical replica of a colonial town in central Massachusetts. The highlight of the day was the reading of the Declaration of Independence from a podium on the town common. A...

The Bombings We Are Not Paying Attention To

In the last few days the country, if not the world, has had a crash course in bunker buster bombs, ever since three of them literally crashed down on a nuclear weapons development facility in Fordow, Iran.  Delivered by a stealth B2 bomber, the pretext, subtext and...

No Permanent Allies? No Permanent Enemies?

No permanent allies. No permanent enemies. That was a foundational mantra of a ten day community organizing training that I received nearly 40 years ago.  It was a new idea for me, and I struggled with it. Growing up during the height of the cold war, I had been...

Love More. Resist More

  I have recently engaged my mind in a paradox that both strengthens my resolve and soothes my soul.  Love more.  Resist more.  Normally it is thought that loving and resisting need to be kept separate from one another:  you can’t love someone or something you...

A Spiritual Antidote to Fear

In 2008, toward the end of a three-day retreat in Canterbury Cathedral for about 700 Episcopal and Anglican bishops from around the world, Archbishop Rowan Williams finished his brilliant presentation on love and grace, and then asked us to reach out to another. Find...

Preferential Option for the Poor: A Needed Edit

“A preferential option for the poor” became a foundational component of Catholic Social teaching when the term was first issued by Latin American Catholic leaders and theologians in the mid-1960s. The phrase echoed the many admonitions from Jesus as recorded in the...

Emerging Moral Obscenity

It is a moral obscenity.  It is said by some that white Afrikaners in South Africa are the victims of genocide, but there is no data to support the claim. It is said that the cohort of Afrikaners coming to America are refugees, but there are indications that they are...

The Ordering of Love: a New Debate in the Culture Wars

Several decades ago, a national debate raged over a question that helped launch America’s ongoing culture war:  who can you love? One side was insistent that love – which would involve intimate sexual expression – should be confined to a man and a woman. A popular...
Subscribe To Our Newsletter

Subscribe To Our Newsletter

Join my mailing list to receive the latest blog updates.

You have Successfully Subscribed!