The Supreme Court on Abortion: An Invasion of Privacy

Years ago, when I was receiving training in community organizing, we wrestled with the tension between personal and private.  Expressing the challenge of being a parent of teenage children was personal, and appropriate; but going into the details of that challenge, and exposing the confidentiality of one’s children, was private, and therefore off-limits.  Referring to one’s experience of being demeaned, diminished or dismissed was personal — and could help build solidarity around an organizing issue; but being pressured into revealing the particulars of those stories was private, and should not be other people’s business.

Drawing a line between what is personal and what is private is not always easy.  Hence, we wrestle.  But there are times when an intensely personal issue has crossed the line into the private is achingly clear.  As it was this past week when  the leaked draft decision on the Mississippi abortion case before the Supreme Court became public.

Much of the discussion surrounding the Supreme Court case has focused on legal arguments, and their political implications.  They are important, to be sure, and warrant our attention.  But for me, the draft ruling to overturn Roe v. Wade is first an invasion of privacy.  And a threat to intimacy.

Pregnancy emerges from the most physically intimate activity that two human beings can engage in, and which almost always occurs in settings that are intentionally private.  A pregnancy that emerges from that intimacy and privacy may be desired, but is often received as a surprise, or presents an overwhelming challenge —or results from unwanted aggression.   In those situations, to have have an outside entity declare that terminating the pregnancy is not permitted — because of legal, legislative or theological reasons (or some combination of all three) brings a stranger into the mix —and leaves a woman even more isolated — and further removed from the intimacy of personal and private relationships that she needs in order to figure out what to do next.

In my conversations over the years with women who were contemplating an abortion, or who had recently undergone an abortion procedure, there was intense wrestling over what to do or what they had done.  As they sought my counsel, I reflected on the impossible position they found themselves in, and the difficulty they faced in coming to a decision.  In all cases, they needed support.

For me, the draft Supreme Court ruling represents a demonstration of power.  Power over women, yes, but power also declaring, without any ambiguity, that new life begins at the moment of conception, thus denying (and deriding), a scientifically supported view that new life is viable only at twenty weeks.  Given the current political (and religious) climate, I don’t think that that stark difference will be bridged anytime soon.

There is, I firmly believe, another way to look at this highly important issue.  That life, how it arrives and how it leaves, remains a mystery.  We can’t control it nor can we fully figure it out.  We need to respect life, and honor it— and all the relationships that flow from it; and to do so it is necessary to provide opportunities for privacy and intimacy , in order to sort out its mystery.  Reversing Roe v. Wade would cancel that much-needed space.

What Do The Risks of Aleksei Navalny and Jesus Say to Us?

When Aleksei Navalny returned to Russia from Germany in January 2021 after recovering from being poisoned, prison was certain and death was likely.   Navalny died on Friday, February 16 at the IK-3 Penal Colony, located 1200 miles northeast of Moscow in the arctic...

Aging, the Election and a Pathway Through the Chaos

Are Joe Biden and Donald Trump too old to be President?  This question is getting a lot of attention, with no end of commentary.  Assessments are being made as to each candidate’s physical stamina, mental acuity, and psychological health.  Recommendations have been...

Immigration: Moving Beyond Technical Fix to Adaptive Challenge

In 2013 I spent a couple of days at the southern border with a group of fellow bishops.  We stayed in Douglas Arizona, but several times made our way through the checkpoint into Agua Prieta, Mexico.  A small group of us helped deliver water to the several water tanks...

From a Dentist’s Chair: Musings on Vulnerability

Last week I sat for two hours in a periodontist’s office while receiving a dental implant.  My mouth was adequately and expertly numbed, and the only discomfort I felt was the anxiety I experienced when the periodontist began to drill into my jawbone.  There was not...

I Versus We

Some fifty years ago, The Episcopal Church, along with many other Christian denominations, went through a liturgical upgrade.  The Nicene Creed, which was first written in 325 during the Council of Nicea (and from which its name is derived), and which is said at most...

Ep 10 – “How We Learn to Be Brave” with Bishop Mariann Budde

We discuss the process of discernment in decisive moments in life and faith, and how God calls us to be brave in such moments.

Ep 9 – “Following the Way of Jesus” with Pastor Raymond Chang

We discuss the roots of Ray’s faith commitment, the origins and nature of his work to prevent gun violence and racialized violence, current events in Israel and Palestine, and the role of reconciliation in all of this.

Stepping Out of Fear and Into Light and Hope

It was someone else’s story, but over the years I have retold it as if it has become my own.  It was Gardner Taylor’s story, which he told at the end of a sermon during my first year of divinity school, nearly fifty years ago.  Dr. Taylor was then the pastor of...

Ep 8 – “Finding Solutions Together” with Angela Ferrell-Zabala

Our discussion touches on faith and love for our neighbors and Angela shares the powerful example and influence of her mother on her life.

Where Does Evil Come From? How Best to Deal with It?

Several years ago, while still an active bishop, I facilitated a meeting that I suspected would not go well.  It didn’t.  People, including me, came in angry or scared – or both.  Half the group resisted the agenda, and the other half resented the resisters.   Nearly...
Subscribe To Our Newsletter

Subscribe To Our Newsletter

Join my mailing list to receive the latest blog updates.

You have Successfully Subscribed!