More Guns: A Manifestation of the ‘I’ Culture

In half the states in America, it is now legal to openly carry a handgun, without getting a permit or receiving any training.  The New York Times reported on October 26 that the law in Texas, which went into effect in September, 2021, is making law enforcement officials nervous, because people without skill or experience are allowed to wield dangerous weapons.  Champions of the new law cite instances when law-abiding citizens have thwarted crime because they were carrying firearms; whereas those opposed to the lack of restriction around guns point to incidents when innocent people have been accidentally shot (and in some cases killed) because so-called defenders of property and people are firing recklessly and impulsively in stressful situations.

If there is grace in the horrors of gun violence (and it is often hard to find it) is that both sides in the gun debate seek agree that the violence is, in fact, horrible.  There is agreement that we need to work at reducing gun violence.  How to do that is, well, another issue.  One side maintains that more guns – with fewer restrictions on access, make people safer; while people on the other side say just the opposite.

There is a fundamental difference between the two approaches, which usually gets lost in the hostile rhetoric and the deepening disdain that each side has for the other.  In his book, The Upswing: How America Came Together a Century Ago and How We Can Do It Again, authors Robert Putnam and Shaylyn Romney Garrett describe how American society moved from an “I” culture in the late 1880s (during the so-called gilded age) to a “We” culture, which lasted through the mid-1960s.  A “we” culture recognizes that we live in community – which means that we are accountable to one another; and that our actions and desires have implications for others.   In recent decades. Putnam and Romney Garrett contend that that we have consistently and inexorably moved back to an “I” culture:  my rights, my guns, my freedom, my truth; which results in a neglect, even a hostility toward those outside of one’s small circle.  The trend toward allowing people to carry weapons openly, without permit or training, is – to my mind, the ultimate manifestation of an “I” culture.

There is a lot of talk and commentary in public spaces about privilege.  We often hear and read about white privilege, privileged upbringings – and at holiday time appeals are made to remember (and make gifts to) kids who are underprivileged. Critiques are issued, which often results in resentment, especially for people embedded in an “I” culture.  The concept of privilege makes little sense for those living in an “I” culture, because privilege suggests that some people – because of race, income, legacy, zip code or some other factor, have a built-in advantage over others; that there are comparisons to be made and need to be dealt with.  But a component of an “I” culture is to limit one’s focus on oneself and one’s circle; comparisons are unimportant, if not a waste of time.  Besides, this vein of thinking continues, we get to where we are because of hard work, grit and perseverance.  People who have fallen behind haven’t tried hard enough or are inherently inferior.  ‘I didn’t get a boost up’, the thinking goes; ‘why should anyone else?’  ‘And I need to protect myself – by any means necessary’. 

I have a friend who says that privilege is being in a position to hear only what you want to hear.  Privilege becomes even more rarified if one’s world is constructed to limit exposure to other viewpoints; and that one can easily cordon off anything and anyone outside “my” sphere of life.  And carry weapons to protect it.

I know the temptation to seal myself off, and to limit what I hear and read to positions that conform to my siloed perspective on things.  To take up residence in an “I” world for a time, especially when I am fearful or anxious.  And when that happens, I tend to grab on tighter to my privilege, and even try and reinforce it, because I think it is one of the only things that will protect me.

Whether we like people or not; whether we agree with people are not, we are nonetheless accountable to each other.  We share the same humanity.   Martin Luther King gave his life witnessing to that challenge.  So did Jesus.

It is hard work.  It is necessary work.  Putnam and Romney Garrett  give some recent examples of movements toward a “we” culture, even in the face of the vehement and sometimes vicious demands to retain the “I” culture.  We would do well to build on their fragile optimism, and invest in “we”.  And trust in hope, which, as writer Jim Wallis has said, is believing in spite of the evidence, and then watching the evidence change.

 

The Dread of the Assassination Attempt

Like many of us, the attempted assassination of Donald Trump sent my mind racing.  Who was the shooter?  Why did he do it?  Was security inadequate?  Would former President Trump be OK?  What does this mean for the election?  For Republicans?  For Democrats?  For the...

Praying for Biden and Trump

For a good stretch of my early years, prayer was a confounding exercise.  My family regularly went to church – where the congregation prayed while I dealt with itching legs from my flannel pants.  We said grace before dinner, which invariably became a contest over...

A Debate of Egos; the Need for the Soul

Last week I attended a debate watch party.  It was held in the Carthage College chapel in Kenosha, Wisconsin, on the first night of the Braver Angels Convention, an annual event that brings equal numbers of red (conservative) and blue (progressive) and yellow...

The Ten Commandments: Laws or Guidelines

Last week the governor of Louisiana signed a law mandating that the Ten Commandments be displayed in public school classrooms.  In some ways I get it, in spite of the fact that like so many it challenges the constitutional separation of church and state.  The Ten...

Mistrust and Trust

It was the spring of 1970.  The United States had just announced that it was expanding the war in Vietnam by authorizing bombing campaigns in Cambodia.  Campuses across the country erupted in protest.  On May 4, four protesting students at Kent State were shot and...

Challenges to Trusting the Process

Trust the process. This was a phrase I often heard when a strategy session or a problem-solving meeting bogged down.   The group would get stuck, and in frustration someone would either suggest we scrap the whole enterprise, or would start accusing a participant of...

Ep 13 – “A Common Humanity” with Wilk Wilkinson

Wilk Wilkinson joins me to discuss his journey from political apathy to toxic political engagement, followed by the epiphany that since led him on a mission of bettering the world, one attitude at a time, by charting a course toward understanding, bridging divides, and fostering a community where wisdom prevails over discord.

Time and Space Needed for Grief and Mourning

“In war, death interrupts nothing.  Time doesn’t stop; it seems to accelerate.”  So wrote David French, in a New York Times column on May 25, 2024.  A veteran of the Iraq War, French goes on to say that in battle there is no time or space for mourning the loss of a...

Whose Land is It?

A couple of weeks ago, I came across this passage from my daily reading:     “From the wilderness and the Lebanon as far as the great river, the river Euphrates,all the land of the Hittites, to the Great Sea in the west shall be your territory.   No one will be able...

Ep 12 – “The Church Cracked Open” with The Rev. Canon Stephanie Spellers

Canon Spellers shares her journey from being a skeptic and critic of the Church to becoming a senior leader with a deep faith and a commitment to social justice. We explore the themes of mission, evangelism, the power of genuine curiosity in bridging divides, and ongoing efforts to address systemic issues like white supremacy within the church.

Subscribe To Our Newsletter

Subscribe To Our Newsletter

Join my mailing list to receive the latest blog updates.

You have Successfully Subscribed!