Vulnerability, Mystery and Artificial Intelligence

Functional Atheism is a term I first heard about thirty years ago from writer and conference leader Parker Palmer.  He described a functional atheist as someone who says they believe in God but lives as though God doesn’t exist.  I have held on to the term for these many years, because it applies to so many of us who claim to be believers.  It certainly does to me.

I am a recovering functional atheist.  I repeatedly tell myself that I have enough intelligence, energy, relationships, focus – and electronic devices, that I can get by on my own.  And with the advent – and the rapid advancement, of Artificial Intelligence, our electronic devices now have the capacity to not only guide, but govern our lives.  To solve what have been unsolvable problems.  The functional atheist in me often says – with no small amount of compassion, that I will give God a break.  God shouldn’t need to worry about me.  After all, God has much bigger and urgent issues to deal with:  climate change, Ukraine, gun violence, polarization, the next potential pandemic – and who knows what else or what’s next.  And with faster, accessible and almost magical devices at my disposal, I can create the illusion that I am in control.

It is an illusion which often has me worried.  As are an increasing number of technical experts – many of whom have long abandoned any belief in a divine being; because of the potential for AI to make some serious, if not planet- threatening mistakes.  As I understand it, AI has the ability to evaluate a nuclear threat, and respond in milliseconds with the full array of weapons of mass destruction (WMD).  And the machine’s judgment could be wrong – and unleash unimaginable devastation.  All based on a miscalculation – not a mathematical or scientific mistake, but a human one.

Which is what has me worried.  AI is evolving faster than we can keep up with it.  AI seeks to learn more — and compute, write and create ever faster on what it is learning.  The algorithms which are foundational to the ongoing development of Artificial Intelligence are not able to create space for vulnerability or mystery – which are integral and ineffable components of what it means to be human.

While in seminary forty-five years ago, I took a class on medical ethics, attended by medical and divinity students. One of the professors, a physician, posed a question:  if medicine had advanced to the point that it could produce a medication that could cure any and all diseases, how would we go about distributing it?  A confounding triage question, which raises no end of ethical challenges.  But some of us took issue with the premise of the question itself:  that it would be the ultimate hubris to think that science could develop an elixir that could cure any malady.  To be able, in effect, not just to play God, but in effect to become God.  And to think that we will be able to step out of our humanity.

It seems to me, with the unrestricted development of AI, that we are approaching that level of hubris.  That the more confident and competent we become, the less likely we will want – or be able, to factor in vulnerability and mystery.  Vulnerability can certainly be minimized, but it will never be erased.  Much as we might like to think otherwise, at some point we will all die, an event which confirms our vulnerability.   Mystery can often be explained, but there will always be moments that defy explanation.  The origin of the universe and the existence of suffering will always be shrouded in mystery.

Science and technology will continue to refine and expand the capacity of Artificial Intelligence.  That is essential to their respective missions.  In the wake of this technological expansion, it becomes even more critical for us as humans, to put some restrictions on AI’s development, yes, but more importantly,  to remind ourselves of our inherent vulnerability; and that even the smartest among us – which may end up being a computer program, cannot fully explain what it means to be alive.

AI poses an opportunity – and challenge, for us to claim and own the basic ingredients of what it means to be human, which inevitably contain vulnerabilities and mysteries that the most sophisticated technology will never be able to master. 

Claiming our vulnerability and mystery may turn out to be our saving grace.








Scams: Preying on Vulnerability and Violating Trust

I fell for a scam last week.  My computer froze, a pop up alarm appeared and said needed to call Microsoft immediately to protect all that was stored on my desktop, lest foreign hackers steal my data, documents and identity.  The Microsoft number was prominently...

Easter: Breaking Through a Contraining System

He broke out.  He got up.  In faith Christians proclaim that Jesus rose from the grave:  Alleluia!  Christ is Risen.  What follows are hymns of praise, expressions of joy, a profusion of flowers – all offered to gatherings that are double the size of a normal Sunday...

Ep 11 – “Passion and Patience” with The Rev. Dr. Amy Peeler

Amy shares about her journey of faith, path to ordination as an Episcopal priest, passion for and vocation of studying scripture, and the blessings and challenges she has experienced along the way.

Fake News, Misinformation, and Truth

When I arrived in Japan in late August, 1973, for a two year fellowship, the country was preparing to honor the 50th anniversary of the Tokyo earthquake, which upended the city for four minutes on September 1, 1923.  140,000 people were killed, many by the 7.9...

Reflections on Christian Nationalism

“The opposite of faith is not doubt”, a wise mentor once said to me, recalling a line from Christian writer Anne Lamott; “the opposite of faith is certainty.”  Religious claims of certainty have been surging on public platforms and in various political expressions. ...

Fighting Insults and Condemnation with the Power of Love

We were at the breakfast table.  My daughter, then about a year and a half, was in her highchair, scrambled eggs on the tray in front of her.  With an impish grin, she threw some of her meal on the floor.  “Don’t do that,” I said in a rather stern tone.  With an even...

Contrasting Interpretations of Discipline

“We will not allow for a policy of ‘anything goes’”.  So said the Chair of a plenary meeting of Anglican bishops in 2008.  There were about seven hundred bishops from around the world attending the once every decade gathering in Canterbury, England.  The plenary took...

Selling the Soul to the Ego

I don’t know people who have literally sold their soul, a metaphor that goes back centuries, but there are many of us who have abandoned, ignored, forgotten or dismissed the very concept of soul.  There are ancient and medieval legendary characters — Theophilus, a...

What Do The Risks of Aleksei Navalny and Jesus Say to Us?

When Aleksei Navalny returned to Russia from Germany in January 2021 after recovering from being poisoned, prison was certain and death was likely.   Navalny died on Friday, February 16 at the IK-3 Penal Colony, located 1200 miles northeast of Moscow in the arctic...

Aging, the Election and a Pathway Through the Chaos

Are Joe Biden and Donald Trump too old to be President?  This question is getting a lot of attention, with no end of commentary.  Assessments are being made as to each candidate’s physical stamina, mental acuity, and psychological health.  Recommendations have been...
Subscribe To Our Newsletter

Subscribe To Our Newsletter

Join my mailing list to receive the latest blog updates.

You have Successfully Subscribed!