Vulnerability, Mystery and Artificial Intelligence

Functional Atheism is a term I first heard about thirty years ago from writer and conference leader Parker Palmer.  He described a functional atheist as someone who says they believe in God but lives as though God doesn’t exist.  I have held on to the term for these many years, because it applies to so many of us who claim to be believers.  It certainly does to me.

I am a recovering functional atheist.  I repeatedly tell myself that I have enough intelligence, energy, relationships, focus – and electronic devices, that I can get by on my own.  And with the advent – and the rapid advancement, of Artificial Intelligence, our electronic devices now have the capacity to not only guide, but govern our lives.  To solve what have been unsolvable problems.  The functional atheist in me often says – with no small amount of compassion, that I will give God a break.  God shouldn’t need to worry about me.  After all, God has much bigger and urgent issues to deal with:  climate change, Ukraine, gun violence, polarization, the next potential pandemic – and who knows what else or what’s next.  And with faster, accessible and almost magical devices at my disposal, I can create the illusion that I am in control.

It is an illusion which often has me worried.  As are an increasing number of technical experts – many of whom have long abandoned any belief in a divine being; because of the potential for AI to make some serious, if not planet- threatening mistakes.  As I understand it, AI has the ability to evaluate a nuclear threat, and respond in milliseconds with the full array of weapons of mass destruction (WMD).  And the machine’s judgment could be wrong – and unleash unimaginable devastation.  All based on a miscalculation – not a mathematical or scientific mistake, but a human one.

Which is what has me worried.  AI is evolving faster than we can keep up with it.  AI seeks to learn more — and compute, write and create ever faster on what it is learning.  The algorithms which are foundational to the ongoing development of Artificial Intelligence are not able to create space for vulnerability or mystery – which are integral and ineffable components of what it means to be human.

While in seminary forty-five years ago, I took a class on medical ethics, attended by medical and divinity students. One of the professors, a physician, posed a question:  if medicine had advanced to the point that it could produce a medication that could cure any and all diseases, how would we go about distributing it?  A confounding triage question, which raises no end of ethical challenges.  But some of us took issue with the premise of the question itself:  that it would be the ultimate hubris to think that science could develop an elixir that could cure any malady.  To be able, in effect, not just to play God, but in effect to become God.  And to think that we will be able to step out of our humanity.

It seems to me, with the unrestricted development of AI, that we are approaching that level of hubris.  That the more confident and competent we become, the less likely we will want – or be able, to factor in vulnerability and mystery.  Vulnerability can certainly be minimized, but it will never be erased.  Much as we might like to think otherwise, at some point we will all die, an event which confirms our vulnerability.   Mystery can often be explained, but there will always be moments that defy explanation.  The origin of the universe and the existence of suffering will always be shrouded in mystery.

Science and technology will continue to refine and expand the capacity of Artificial Intelligence.  That is essential to their respective missions.  In the wake of this technological expansion, it becomes even more critical for us as humans, to put some restrictions on AI’s development, yes, but more importantly,  to remind ourselves of our inherent vulnerability; and that even the smartest among us – which may end up being a computer program, cannot fully explain what it means to be alive.

AI poses an opportunity – and challenge, for us to claim and own the basic ingredients of what it means to be human, which inevitably contain vulnerabilities and mysteries that the most sophisticated technology will never be able to master. 

Claiming our vulnerability and mystery may turn out to be our saving grace.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

The Many Facets of Exile

I didn’t intend for it to be a self-imposed exile, but in some ways that is how it turned out.  When I graduated from college in 1973 I lived in Kyoto, Japan for two years on a fellowship that involved teaching and being the resident Fellow in a university dormitory....

Out of Many, One

On Sunday evening, July 6, the Braver Faith team of Braver Angels hosted a webinar entitled "Faith and Freedom Through Reflection and Prayer." The event was scheduled to honor the Fourth of July weekend. A link to the 75 minute webinar can be found  here.a link  It...

Faith and Freedom: Preparing for July 4

Many years ago I took my family to the July 4th festivities at Old Sturbridge Village,  an historical replica of a colonial town in central Massachusetts. The highlight of the day was the reading of the Declaration of Independence from a podium on the town common. A...

The Bombings We Are Not Paying Attention To

In the last few days the country, if not the world, has had a crash course in bunker buster bombs, ever since three of them literally crashed down on a nuclear weapons development facility in Fordow, Iran.  Delivered by a stealth B2 bomber, the pretext, subtext and...

No Permanent Allies? No Permanent Enemies?

No permanent allies. No permanent enemies. That was a foundational mantra of a ten day community organizing training that I received nearly 40 years ago.  It was a new idea for me, and I struggled with it. Growing up during the height of the cold war, I had been...

Love More. Resist More

  I have recently engaged my mind in a paradox that both strengthens my resolve and soothes my soul.  Love more.  Resist more.  Normally it is thought that loving and resisting need to be kept separate from one another:  you can’t love someone or something you...

A Spiritual Antidote to Fear

In 2008, toward the end of a three-day retreat in Canterbury Cathedral for about 700 Episcopal and Anglican bishops from around the world, Archbishop Rowan Williams finished his brilliant presentation on love and grace, and then asked us to reach out to another. Find...

Preferential Option for the Poor: A Needed Edit

“A preferential option for the poor” became a foundational component of Catholic Social teaching when the term was first issued by Latin American Catholic leaders and theologians in the mid-1960s. The phrase echoed the many admonitions from Jesus as recorded in the...

Emerging Moral Obscenity

It is a moral obscenity.  It is said by some that white Afrikaners in South Africa are the victims of genocide, but there is no data to support the claim. It is said that the cohort of Afrikaners coming to America are refugees, but there are indications that they are...

The Ordering of Love: a New Debate in the Culture Wars

Several decades ago, a national debate raged over a question that helped launch America’s ongoing culture war:  who can you love? One side was insistent that love – which would involve intimate sexual expression – should be confined to a man and a woman. A popular...
Subscribe To Our Newsletter

Subscribe To Our Newsletter

Join my mailing list to receive the latest blog updates.

You have Successfully Subscribed!