Contrasting Interpretations of Discipline

“We will not allow for a policy of ‘anything goes’”.  So said the Chair of a plenary meeting of Anglican bishops in 2008.  There were about seven hundred bishops from around the world attending the once every decade gathering in Canterbury, England.  The plenary took place one afternoon during the three-week conference.  The topic was sexuality, specifically the issue of whether or not to  allow gay and lesbian people to be ordained, and to have their relationships blessed.  There was considerable cultural and theological disagreement among the diverse group of prelates; and the chair – a former British military officer, sought to keep a tight reign on the discussion.  “We will not allow anything goes”, he said again, intending to institute some discipline on those he clearly felt didn’t have any.  The tension level in the room, already palpable, got even more charged with fear and distrust, as he expressed his disdain for those who held a different viewpoint.

The Chair was invoking a classic understanding of discipline, which is to correct or punish behavior  which is deemed to be unacceptable.  Keep people in line, the thinking goes; don’t challenge the rules – each of which are benchmarks for efficient and effective military practice.  Anything outside of the established paradigm is regarded as “anything goes.” 

I was insulted by the British bishop’s comments.  He was implying that those of us who championed the rights of LGBT people – at every level in the church, had been coopted by the fad of the moment; that we were buffeted about by the winds of secularism.  That there were no theological or biblical roots to our position. 

There is another, quite distinct understanding of discipline, which predates the rather punitive attitude that seems to prevail in so many areas of our modern life.  The root of the word discipline is discipulus, a Latin term which refers to a student or a pupil; a disciple, if you will.  The disciples of Jesus were students and followers of his message.  He tried to invoke a level of discipline on them, not by punishing but by encouraging them to absorb his wisdom, vision and teaching. Jesus’ perspective of sin, sabbath and healing generated a passionate following, and at the same time drew the concern of various religious and political authorities who regarded Jesus’ positions as anything goes.  They contrived  ways to discipline him for his radical views and actions, and eventually succeeded in nailing him to a cross.   As a modern disciple of Jesus, I have sought to embrace Jesus’ conviction that we are all imago dei, created in the image of God; and to actively and prophetically love all of God’s creatures, which for me means to offer my full blessing on everyone.  Discipline then becomes a set of practices which reinforce the commitment to one another and can move us to a greater sense of freedom. Those are deep roots; anything but anything goes.

That said, at some level I understand the concern that many people, rooted in a cultural and theological tradition, who feel that those who are not so rooted subscribe to a morality that is defined by whatever feels good in the moment, that impulses need to be honored and acted upon– and that traditions are too ossified to be respected.  I get that – to a degree, because the secular swirl of instant gratification can sometimes generate a similar sort of disdain for those who seem, from their perspective, to be too tied to life-denying roots.

And yet the military notion of discipline seems to be getting more attention and purchase these days.  There are a growing number of forces and voices who claim that certain policy positions – transgender rights, abortion access, and what are construed (erroneously) as open borders – are misguided, if not dangerous; and are tantamount to “anything goes”.  There is a growing refusal to acknowledge that such positions have moral and theological underpinnings.    From this perspective, discipline (in the militaristic sense) then needs to be imposed; and certain behaviors need to be corrected, if not punished. The results are increasingly harsh, if not cruel; and end up accelerating the process of polarization.

More space needs to be given to the notion of discipline as a set of practices that are intended for growth – for everyone.  We need more and more people who subscribe to discipline as discipulus, disciples who commit to a process of learning – from deep and diverse cultural and religious roots, which seek to bring people together.  Discipline in this discipulus sense, can serve as a corrective to the cacophony of calls for vengeance and punishment. If we are willing to learn.

 

 

The Ten Commandments: Laws or Guidelines

Last week the governor of Louisiana signed a law mandating that the Ten Commandments be displayed in public school classrooms.  In some ways I get it, in spite of the fact that like so many it challenges the constitutional separation of church and state.  The Ten...

Mistrust and Trust

It was the spring of 1970.  The United States had just announced that it was expanding the war in Vietnam by authorizing bombing campaigns in Cambodia.  Campuses across the country erupted in protest.  On May 4, four protesting students at Kent State were shot and...

Challenges to Trusting the Process

Trust the process. This was a phrase I often heard when a strategy session or a problem-solving meeting bogged down.   The group would get stuck, and in frustration someone would either suggest we scrap the whole enterprise, or would start accusing a participant of...

Ep 13 – “A Common Humanity” with Wilk Wilkinson

Wilk Wilkinson joins me to discuss his journey from political apathy to toxic political engagement, followed by the epiphany that since led him on a mission of bettering the world, one attitude at a time, by charting a course toward understanding, bridging divides, and fostering a community where wisdom prevails over discord.

Time and Space Needed for Grief and Mourning

“In war, death interrupts nothing.  Time doesn’t stop; it seems to accelerate.”  So wrote David French, in a New York Times column on May 25, 2024.  A veteran of the Iraq War, French goes on to say that in battle there is no time or space for mourning the loss of a...

Whose Land is It?

A couple of weeks ago, I came across this passage from my daily reading:     “From the wilderness and the Lebanon as far as the great river, the river Euphrates,all the land of the Hittites, to the Great Sea in the west shall be your territory.   No one will be able...

Ep 12 – “The Church Cracked Open” with The Rev. Canon Stephanie Spellers

Canon Spellers shares her journey from being a skeptic and critic of the Church to becoming a senior leader with a deep faith and a commitment to social justice. We explore the themes of mission, evangelism, the power of genuine curiosity in bridging divides, and ongoing efforts to address systemic issues like white supremacy within the church.

Dealing With Fear

Tornados of fear are swirling around the world, many of them invading our psyches.  Wars in Ukraine and Gaza, not to mention Sudan and Myanmar; escalating climate change; unrelenting gun violence; immigration crises.  To my mind, the storms of fear are particularly...

The Different Layers of Campus Anger

I lived a block away from a campus protest that erupted in November, 1974.  I was a teaching fellow at Doshisha University in Kyoto, Japan, and the campus was about to be shut down in opposition to Gerald Ford’s visit to the city, the first time an American President...

Campus Protests: What We Bring to What We See

In the past week I have had several conversations with friends about our respective opinions on what is happening on college campuses across the country, as students have set up encampments to protest the war in Gaza and insist that their university divest any...
Subscribe To Our Newsletter

Subscribe To Our Newsletter

Join my mailing list to receive the latest blog updates.

You have Successfully Subscribed!